Combatting Cross-Contamination

Combating Cross-Contamination in Food Processing

The Role of Technology in Modern Food Safety

The Ongoing Impact of Cross-Contamination on Food Safety

Cross-contamination – the transfer of harmful microorganisms from one surface or food to another – remains a formidable challenge in food processing. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that each year in the United States, about 48 million people (roughly 1 in 6) suffer from foodborne illnesses, leading to 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths. Many of these illnesses can be traced to pathogens spreading via contaminated equipment, surfaces, or handlers. Analyses of U.S. outbreak data show that the cross-contamination of foodscontributes to roughly 12% of foodborne illness outbreaks. Recent history underscores this risk: in 2024, several high-profile outbreaks were linked to contaminated surfaces in processing facilities, exposing gaps in traditional sanitation protocols. Such events threaten public health, damage brand reputations, and trigger costly recalls. This reality has intensified the demand for innovative cross-contamination prevention strategies in modern food safety programs.

Key Pathogens Driving Cross-Contamination in Processing Facilities

Salmonella, Escherichia coli (particularly E. coli O157:H7 and other Shiga toxin-producing strains), and Listeria monocytogenes are among the chief bacterial culprits behind cross-contamination incidents in food processing environments. According to CDC estimates, nontyphoidal Salmonella alone accounts for about 11% of foodborne illnesses in the U.S., making it the most common bacterial cause. E. coli (various strains) and Campylobacter each account for roughly 9–10% of cases. Salmonella contamination has been at the root of numerous outbreaks in processed foods – from peanut butter to powdered milk – often due to undetected spread on equipment or within ingredients. E. coli O157:H7, though responsible for a smaller fraction of illnesses, frequently causes severe outbreaks associated with under-processed foods (e.g., undercooked beef or even raw flour in cookie dough) and can be spread via insufficiently sanitized machinery or utensils.

Listeria monocytogenes is a particularly insidious pathogen in food processing. It causes relatively fewer illnesses annually (~1,600 cases in the U.S.), but those infections are severe, leading to about 260 deaths per year – making listeriosis the third leading cause of death among foodborne illnesses. Listeria is notorious for thriving in processing facilities: it tolerates cold and high-salt environments and can colonize floors, drains, and processing lines. Cross-contamination with Listeria has led to deadly outbreaks in ready-to-eat meats, dairy, and produce. For example, a listeriosis outbreak traced to fresh cantaloupe in 2011 was ultimately linked to Listeria harbored on packing equipment, which had cross-contaminated the fruit. Similarly, environmental swabbing during investigations often finds Listeria on food contact surfaces, even in facilities with regular sanitation – one study of produce packinghouses found Listeria on 4.6% of sampled surfaces post-sanitation, underscoring how persistent these pathogens can be. Even pathogens adapted to dry environments pose risks: for instance, Cronobacter sakazakii (a bacterium that survives in powdered foods) prompted infant formula recalls due to suspected cross-contamination in production, despite exhaustive cleaning and testing. These examples illustrate that whether the pathogen is common, like Salmonella, or rare, like Cronobacter, food safety professionals must remain vigilant against their spread in processing environments.

Biofilms: A Hidden Culprit in Cross-Contamination

A major reason pathogens persist and spread in facilities is the formation of biofilms – structured communities of microbes that attach to surfaces and encase themselves in a self-produced extracellular matrix. In food processing plants, biofilms can form on a variety of surfaces: conveyor belts, stainless steel equipment, drains, rubber seals, and other hard-to-clean niches. Once established, these biofilm communities act as reservoir hotspots that continually seed pathogens into the production environment. Biofilms dramatically increase the resilience of bacteria: microbes in a biofilm can withstand cleaning and sanitizing agents at concentrations that would quickly eliminate free-floating cells. Studies show that bacteria embedded in biofilms can be 100–1,000 times more resistant to sanitizers and cleaners than their planktonic counterparts. Even diligent cleaning regimes might leave behind a surviving core of bacteria protected by the biofilm’s matrix. Over time, biofilms can persist for months or even years, re-contaminating equipment and new batches of product. Notably, persistent strains of Listeria have been documented to survive in food processing plants for 8 years or more despite regular sanitation by hunkering down in biofilms.

The presence of biofilms greatly complicates cross-contamination prevention. Traditional sanitizers (like chlorine or quaternary ammonium compounds) often struggle to penetrate or remove mature biofilms entirely. A notorious example was the 2014 caramel apple Listeria outbreak, where investigators found that Listeria had likely spread via biofilms on packing line surfaces. Even thorough daily cleaning might fail to eliminate the hidden contamination in such scenarios. For food safety professionals, biofilms represent a formidable adversary – their removal has become a top priority because biofilms can continuously reintroduce pathogens and have been directly linked to recurring outbreaks and product recalls.

Advancements in Food Safety Technology and Microbial Control Solutions

Significant progress has been made in food safety technology designed to mitigate cross-contamination risks in recent years. Researchers and industry leaders are increasingly turning to innovative solutions and smart hygiene systems to complement traditional sanitation. From rapid detection methods to novel surface treatments, many tools are emerging to address the weak points that traditional cleaning alone cannot fully manage.

Key advancements include:

  • Rapid Pathogen Detection and Monitoring: New diagnostic tools enable faster and more sensitive detection of contaminants in the processing environment. For example, DNA-based methods like PCR and next-generation sequencing can identify pathogens in hours instead of days, catching contamination early. Additionally, real-time biosensors are being deployed on processing lines to continuously monitor for microbial presence. These technologies improve surveillance, allowing facilities to pinpoint contamination hot spots and respond before problems escalate.
  • UV-C and Advanced Sanitization Systems: Ultraviolet light, especially UV-C, is emerging as a powerful non-chemical method for continuous sanitization in food processing plants. UV-C units can be installed to constantly treat conveyor belts, packaging materials, and air handling systems, inactivating bacteria and viruses on surfaces within seconds of exposure. Importantly, UV treatment leaves no residues and can be safe for use on food contact surfaces when properly enclosed. Regulatory agencies have recognized UV as an effective control step for post-processing environments – for instance, the USDA endorses UV-C as a proven intervention to reduce Listeria on ready-to-eat products. Beyond UV, other technologies like ozone generators and pulsed light systems are also being applied to reduce microbial loads on equipment between production runs.
  • Enzymatic and Biofilm-Targeting Cleaners: A promising development in sanitation chemistry is the use ofenzyme-based cleaners to attack biofilms. Enzymatic detergents (containing proteases, lipases, amylases, etc.) can break down the proteins, fats, and polysaccharides that make up the biofilm matrix – essentially “dissolving” the protective shelter of microbes. Unlike harsh caustic chemicals, these biological cleaners are often low-toxicity and biodegradable. Food industry trials have shown that enzyme-cleaning formulations, sometimes used in combination with mild surfactants, can significantly reduce biofilm residues that standard sanitizers leave behind. By weakening biofilm structures, enzymatic treatments allow subsequent cleaning agents to penetrate and neutralize the now-exposed bacteria more effectively. This approach – sometimes called biofilm remediation – is increasingly being integrated into cleaning protocols for dairies, breweries, and meat plants where persistent biofilms are a known issue.
  • Bacteriophage (Phage) Applications: Another innovative approach is using bacteriophages, viruses that infect and specifically target bacteria. Phage-based treatments have been developed to target pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes on food contact surfaces and ready-to-eat foods. For instance, phage sprays can be applied to equipment or product surfaces to selectively eliminate Listeria without affecting beneficial microbes or leaving chemical residues. These phage preparations are typically species-specific and have been approved as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) by regulators for certain uses. Early studies indicate that phages can help reduce contamination on deli slicers, conveyor belts, and hard-to-reach niches, providing an eco-friendly supplement to chemical sanitizers. While not a standalone solution, phages add an extra hurdle for pathogens and can be part of a multi-pronged cross-contamination prevention strategy.
  • Long-Lasting Protective Surface Coatings: One of the most groundbreaking advancements is the development of durable surface coatings for facilities. These unique formulations—often involving nanotechnology or novel chemistries—can be applied to walls, floors, drains, and equipment to continuously inhibit microbial survival and biofilm formation. Some coatings slowly release germ-neutralizing agents over time (such as silver ions or quaternary ammonium compounds), while others create surfaces on which microbes cannot easily attach or grow. For example, advanced polymer coatings infused with metal nanoparticles or enzymes can make a stainless-steel table self-sanitizing for days or weeks after application. Field trials have shown that treated surfaces maintain significantly lower bacterial counts between routine cleanings, adding a preventive layer of defense. This category of technology adds continuous background protection in a facility, working between normal cleaning cycles to reduce the risk of contamination.

One notable example of these innovative coatings is Kismet Clean.

Kismet Clean’s Residual Surface Coating Technology

The coating’s active ingredient is a natural mineral, nanoparticles of cerium oxide that act as catalytic agents. When microbes land on a surface coated with Kismet Clean, the mediated cerium oxide particles react to the presence of those microorganisms by generating hydrogen peroxide at a micro-level. Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) is a highly effective, broad-spectrum oxidizer and the coating produces it on demand in the presence of pathogens at the microscale. This means any bacterium, virus (including tough non-enveloped viruses like norovirus), or fungus that comes into contact with the treated surface will trigger hydrogen peroxide production.

Notably, this mechanism is catalytic and self-regenerating rather than consumable. Traditional antimicrobial surfaces often work by slowly leaching a chemical (like silver ions or a quaternary ammonium compound) over time. In contrast, Kismet’s mediated cerium oxide doesn’t get used up; as long as the coating is present on the surface, it will produce on-demand hydrogen peroxide.

Chitosan-Enabled: Safe, Sustainable, and Effective

A unique aspect of Kismet Clean’s formulation is that our specialized particles are enabled with chitosan, a naturally occurring biopolymer derived from sources like crustacean shells and fungi. Chitosan serves as a kind of “secret sauce.” First, it’s a sustainable and food-safe polymer – the U.S. FDA recognizes chitosan as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) for certain uses. Chitosan itself has the ability to inhibit microbes. It carries a positive charge that allows it to bind to negatively charged bacterial cell walls, which can disrupt the microbes’ membranes and neutralize them. By integrating chitosan with the cerium oxide, we achieve a dual-action effect: the chitosan helps anchor and distribute the nanoparticles in a stable film on the surface (forming a strong, durable coating), and it provides an initial protective barrier against microbes even before the catalytic action kicks in.

In essence, chitosan makes Kismet Clean coatings especially versatile. The coating can be applied as a thin spray-on film or a more permanent paint-like layer, depending on the need. Once applied and dried, it forms a clear, invisible shield on the target surface. Because chitosan is biocompatible and cerium oxide is a mineral, the dried film is non-toxic and safe to touch. This was a crucial consideration in development – in communicating with food safety officers, we recognize the importance of any intervention to “do no harm” to employees, consumers, or equipment.

Kismet Clean’s technology is designed to complement, not replace, standard hygiene practices. By providing a continuously active surface, it provides protection between regular cleanings. Kismet Clean exemplifies the future of food safety technology: leveraging technology and material science to create environments inherently hostile to pathogens, thereby minimizing opportunities for cross-contamination.

Integrating Technology with Best Practices

While these technological advancements mark the next generation of cross-contamination prevention, they are most effective when integrated into a holistic food safety management plan. Food safety professionals recognize that a combination of innovative tools and rigorous best practices is the optimal path to preventing foodborne illness. Key strategies include:

  • Routine Environmental Monitoring: Regular testing of surfaces, equipment, and end products for microbial contamination is essential. Frequent swabbing and microbial assays (for example, testing for Listeria on floors or Salmonella on equipment) will identify hotspots and verify that interventions, like protective coatings, are working effectively. Data from monitoring can guide targeted sanitation efforts and trigger corrective actions before contaminants spread to food.
  • Enhanced Sanitation Protocols: Upgrading cleaning procedures by incorporating the latest microbial control solutions can dramatically improve outcomes. For example, using enzyme-based cleaners periodically to break down biofilms, followed by application of residual protective treatments, such as the Kismet Clean coating, can achieve a deeper clean than conventional detergents alone. Even simple tweaks – like extending contact time for cleaning agents or using higher water temperatures and steam in certain areas – can reduce microbial harborage. The goal is a multi-layered sanitation routine with minimal opportunity for pathogens to survive or transfer.
  • Employee Training and Hygiene: Human factors remain a leading cause of cross-contamination, so continuous emphasis on workforce training is critical. All staff should be educated on proper personal hygiene (hand washing, glove use, etc.), sanitation procedures, and the importance of separating raw and cooked product zones. Training programs with regular refreshers help employees understand how their actions can inadvertently spread bacteria and viruses. Cultivating a strong food safety culture where employees proactively prevent cross-contamination – by sanitizing tools, avoiding contact between raw and ready-to-eat foods, and strictly following protocols – is just as important as any high-tech intervention.
  • Hygienic Facility and Equipment Design: Considering cross-contamination prevention at the design stage can eliminate many problems before they start. This includes using equipment that is easy to disassemble and clean thoroughly and selecting smooth, non-porous, and corrosion-resistant materials to minimize microbial attachment. Ensuring proper facility zoning is also critical. Simple design considerations like sloped floors and effective drainage prevent water accumulation that could foster biofilms. Additionally, implementing one-way product flow and restricting personnel movement between high-risk and low-risk areas can greatly reduce opportunities for cross-contamination via traffic.

Conclusion: Toward a Safer Food Supply Through Innovation

Cross-contamination in food processing facilities will likely always pose some level of risk, but the landscape of food safety technology is rapidly evolving to meet this challenge. By combining data-driven insights, novel solutions for microbial control, and robust sanitation practices, the food industry is making significant strides in reducing contamination and preventing foodborne illnesses. The integration of innovations like enzymatic biofilm disruptors, UV-based sanitation systems, and real-time monitoring exemplifies a proactive approach – one that doesn’t wait for an outbreak to occur but rather builds prevention into the very fabric of the production process. Kismet Clean shows how leveraging cutting-edge science can yield practical tools that strengthen our defenses against invisible hazards.

Cross-contamination prevention is not solved by any single gadget or protocol; it requires an arsenal of strategies and an adaptive mindset as new threats emerge. Encouragingly, early adopters of advanced interventions are already reporting reductions in contamination rates and more robust control over persistent pathogens.

At Kismet Technologies, we provide solutions that enhance food safety. Kismet Clean offers continuous surface protection that complements existing sanitation protocols. If you are looking to enhance your facility’s hygiene practices and reduce contamination risks, our team is ready to help. Contact us today to learn more about how Kismet’s innovative technology can support your food safety initiatives.

References (APA style):

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2018). Estimates of foodborne illness in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2023). About Listeria infection. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/listeria/about/

Coughlan, L. M., Cotter, P. D., Hill, C., & Álvarez-Ordóñez, A. (2016). New weapons to fight old enemies: Novel strategies for the (bio)control of bacterial biofilms in the food industry. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1641. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01641

Flick, G. J. (2007, July 1). Persistent biofilms problematic in aquaculture, food processing. Global Seafood Alliance: Responsible Seafood Advocate. Retrieved from https://www.globalseafood.org/advocate/persistent-biofilms-problematic-in-aquaculture-food-processing/

Holst, M. M., Wittry, B. C., Crisp, C., Torres, J., Irving, D. J., & Nicholas, D. (2025). Contributing factors of foodborne illness outbreaks — National Outbreak Reporting System, United States, 2014–2022. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 74(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7401a1

Kalosh, A. (2024, July 2). Kismet Clean cruise study shows “remarkable” microbial reduction, lasting protection.Seatrade Cruise News. Retrieved from https://www.seatrade-cruise.com/environmental-health/kismet-clean-cruise-study-shows-remarkable-microbial-reduction-lasting-protection

Kismet Technologies. (2024a). Poultry farm study – Field results [Internal report]. Orlando, FL.

Kismet Technologies. (2024b). Kismet Clean drain study report [Internal report]. Orlando, FL.

Pugazhendhi, A. S., Neal, C. J., Ta, K. M., Molinari, M., Singamaneni, S., Decho, A. W., … & Brisbois, E. J. (2024). A neoteric antibacterial ceria-silver nanozyme for abiotic surfaces. Biomaterials, 307, 122527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122527

Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M. A., Roy, S. L., … & Griffin, P. M. (2011). Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1701.P11101

Zhang, N., Zhang, X., Yan, D., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Li, N., & Chen, Y. (2021). Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and chitosan derivatives in the treatment of enteric infections. Marine Drugs, 19(12), 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120693

Ruiz-Llacsahuanga, B., Hamilton, A., Zaches, R., Hanrahan, I., & Critzer, F. (2021). Prevalence of Listeria species on food contact surfaces in Washington State apple packinghouses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 87(9), e02932-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02932-20

The Role of Technology in Modern Food Safety

The Ongoing Impact of Cross-Contamination on Food Safety

Cross-contamination – the transfer of harmful microorganisms from one surface or food to another – remains a formidable challenge in food processing. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) estimates that each year in the United States, about 48 million people (roughly 1 in 6) suffer from foodborne illnesses, leading to 128,000 hospitalizations and 3,000 deaths. Many of these illnesses can be traced to pathogens spreading via contaminated equipment, surfaces, or handlers. Analyses of U.S. outbreak data show that the cross-contamination of foodscontributes to roughly 12% of foodborne illness outbreaks. Recent history underscores this risk: in 2024, several high-profile outbreaks were linked to contaminated surfaces in processing facilities, exposing gaps in traditional sanitation protocols. Such events threaten public health, damage brand reputations, and trigger costly recalls. This reality has intensified the demand for innovative cross-contamination prevention strategies in modern food safety programs.

Key Pathogens Driving Cross-Contamination in Processing Facilities

Salmonella, Escherichia coli (particularly E. coli O157:H7 and other Shiga toxin-producing strains), and Listeria monocytogenes are among the chief bacterial culprits behind cross-contamination incidents in food processing environments. According to CDC estimates, nontyphoidal Salmonella alone accounts for about 11% of foodborne illnesses in the U.S., making it the most common bacterial cause. E. coli (various strains) and Campylobacter each account for roughly 9–10% of cases. Salmonella contamination has been at the root of numerous outbreaks in processed foods – from peanut butter to powdered milk – often due to undetected spread on equipment or within ingredients. E. coli O157:H7, though responsible for a smaller fraction of illnesses, frequently causes severe outbreaks associated with under-processed foods (e.g., undercooked beef or even raw flour in cookie dough) and can be spread via insufficiently sanitized machinery or utensils.

Listeria monocytogenes is a particularly insidious pathogen in food processing. It causes relatively fewer illnesses annually (~1,600 cases in the U.S.), but those infections are severe, leading to about 260 deaths per year – making listeriosis the third leading cause of death among foodborne illnesses. Listeria is notorious for thriving in processing facilities: it tolerates cold and high-salt environments and can colonize floors, drains, and processing lines. Cross-contamination with Listeria has led to deadly outbreaks in ready-to-eat meats, dairy, and produce. For example, a listeriosis outbreak traced to fresh cantaloupe in 2011 was ultimately linked to Listeria harbored on packing equipment, which had cross-contaminated the fruit. Similarly, environmental swabbing during investigations often finds Listeria on food contact surfaces, even in facilities with regular sanitation – one study of produce packinghouses found Listeria on 4.6% of sampled surfaces post-sanitation, underscoring how persistent these pathogens can be. Even pathogens adapted to dry environments pose risks: for instance, Cronobacter sakazakii (a bacterium that survives in powdered foods) prompted infant formula recalls due to suspected cross-contamination in production, despite exhaustive cleaning and testing. These examples illustrate that whether the pathogen is common, like Salmonella, or rare, like Cronobacter, food safety professionals must remain vigilant against their spread in processing environments.

Biofilms: A Hidden Culprit in Cross-Contamination

A major reason pathogens persist and spread in facilities is the formation of biofilms – structured communities of microbes that attach to surfaces and encase themselves in a self-produced extracellular matrix. In food processing plants, biofilms can form on a variety of surfaces: conveyor belts, stainless steel equipment, drains, rubber seals, and other hard-to-clean niches. Once established, these biofilm communities act as reservoir hotspots that continually seed pathogens into the production environment. Biofilms dramatically increase the resilience of bacteria: microbes in a biofilm can withstand cleaning and sanitizing agents at concentrations that would quickly eliminate free-floating cells. Studies show that bacteria embedded in biofilms can be 100–1,000 times more resistant to sanitizers and cleaners than their planktonic counterparts. Even diligent cleaning regimes might leave behind a surviving core of bacteria protected by the biofilm’s matrix. Over time, biofilms can persist for months or even years, re-contaminating equipment and new batches of product. Notably, persistent strains of Listeria have been documented to survive in food processing plants for 8 years or more despite regular sanitation by hunkering down in biofilms.

The presence of biofilms greatly complicates cross-contamination prevention. Traditional sanitizers (like chlorine or quaternary ammonium compounds) often struggle to penetrate or remove mature biofilms entirely. A notorious example was the 2014 caramel apple Listeria outbreak, where investigators found that Listeria had likely spread via biofilms on packing line surfaces. Even thorough daily cleaning might fail to eliminate the hidden contamination in such scenarios. For food safety professionals, biofilms represent a formidable adversary – their removal has become a top priority because biofilms can continuously reintroduce pathogens and have been directly linked to recurring outbreaks and product recalls.

Advancements in Food Safety Technology and Microbial Control Solutions

Significant progress has been made in food safety technology designed to mitigate cross-contamination risks in recent years. Researchers and industry leaders are increasingly turning to innovative solutions and smart hygiene systems to complement traditional sanitation. From rapid detection methods to novel surface treatments, many tools are emerging to address the weak points that traditional cleaning alone cannot fully manage.

Key advancements include:

  • Rapid Pathogen Detection and Monitoring: New diagnostic tools enable faster and more sensitive detection of contaminants in the processing environment. For example, DNA-based methods like PCR and next-generation sequencing can identify pathogens in hours instead of days, catching contamination early. Additionally, real-time biosensors are being deployed on processing lines to continuously monitor for microbial presence. These technologies improve surveillance, allowing facilities to pinpoint contamination hot spots and respond before problems escalate.
  • UV-C and Advanced Sanitization Systems: Ultraviolet light, especially UV-C, is emerging as a powerful non-chemical method for continuous sanitization in food processing plants. UV-C units can be installed to constantly treat conveyor belts, packaging materials, and air handling systems, inactivating bacteria and viruses on surfaces within seconds of exposure. Importantly, UV treatment leaves no residues and can be safe for use on food contact surfaces when properly enclosed. Regulatory agencies have recognized UV as an effective control step for post-processing environments – for instance, the USDA endorses UV-C as a proven intervention to reduce Listeria on ready-to-eat products. Beyond UV, other technologies like ozone generators and pulsed light systems are also being applied to reduce microbial loads on equipment between production runs.
  • Enzymatic and Biofilm-Targeting Cleaners: A promising development in sanitation chemistry is the use ofenzyme-based cleaners to attack biofilms. Enzymatic detergents (containing proteases, lipases, amylases, etc.) can break down the proteins, fats, and polysaccharides that make up the biofilm matrix – essentially “dissolving” the protective shelter of microbes. Unlike harsh caustic chemicals, these biological cleaners are often low-toxicity and biodegradable. Food industry trials have shown that enzyme-cleaning formulations, sometimes used in combination with mild surfactants, can significantly reduce biofilm residues that standard sanitizers leave behind. By weakening biofilm structures, enzymatic treatments allow subsequent cleaning agents to penetrate and neutralize the now-exposed bacteria more effectively. This approach – sometimes called biofilm remediation – is increasingly being integrated into cleaning protocols for dairies, breweries, and meat plants where persistent biofilms are a known issue.
  • Bacteriophage (Phage) Applications: Another innovative approach is using bacteriophages, viruses that infect and specifically target bacteria. Phage-based treatments have been developed to target pathogens like Listeria monocytogenes on food contact surfaces and ready-to-eat foods. For instance, phage sprays can be applied to equipment or product surfaces to selectively eliminate Listeria without affecting beneficial microbes or leaving chemical residues. These phage preparations are typically species-specific and have been approved as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) by regulators for certain uses. Early studies indicate that phages can help reduce contamination on deli slicers, conveyor belts, and hard-to-reach niches, providing an eco-friendly supplement to chemical sanitizers. While not a standalone solution, phages add an extra hurdle for pathogens and can be part of a multi-pronged cross-contamination prevention strategy.
  • Long-Lasting Protective Surface Coatings: One of the most groundbreaking advancements is the development of durable surface coatings for facilities. These unique formulations—often involving nanotechnology or novel chemistries—can be applied to walls, floors, drains, and equipment to continuously inhibit microbial survival and biofilm formation. Some coatings slowly release germ-neutralizing agents over time (such as silver ions or quaternary ammonium compounds), while others create surfaces on which microbes cannot easily attach or grow. For example, advanced polymer coatings infused with metal nanoparticles or enzymes can make a stainless-steel table self-sanitizing for days or weeks after application. Field trials have shown that treated surfaces maintain significantly lower bacterial counts between routine cleanings, adding a preventive layer of defense. This category of technology adds continuous background protection in a facility, working between normal cleaning cycles to reduce the risk of contamination.

One notable example of these innovative coatings is Kismet Clean.

Kismet Clean’s Residual Surface Coating Technology

The coating’s active ingredient is a natural mineral, nanoparticles of cerium oxide that act as catalytic agents. When microbes land on a surface coated with Kismet Clean, the mediated cerium oxide particles react to the presence of those microorganisms by generating hydrogen peroxide at a micro-level. Hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) is a highly effective, broad-spectrum oxidizer and the coating produces it on demand in the presence of pathogens at the microscale. This means any bacterium, virus (including tough non-enveloped viruses like norovirus), or fungus that comes into contact with the treated surface will trigger hydrogen peroxide production.

Notably, this mechanism is catalytic and self-regenerating rather than consumable. Traditional antimicrobial surfaces often work by slowly leaching a chemical (like silver ions or a quaternary ammonium compound) over time. In contrast, Kismet’s mediated cerium oxide doesn’t get used up; as long as the coating is present on the surface, it will produce on-demand hydrogen peroxide.

Chitosan-Enabled: Safe, Sustainable, and Effective

A unique aspect of Kismet Clean’s formulation is that our specialized particles are enabled with chitosan, a naturally occurring biopolymer derived from sources like crustacean shells and fungi. Chitosan serves as a kind of “secret sauce.” First, it’s a sustainable and food-safe polymer – the U.S. FDA recognizes chitosan as Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) for certain uses. Chitosan itself has the ability to inhibit microbes. It carries a positive charge that allows it to bind to negatively charged bacterial cell walls, which can disrupt the microbes’ membranes and neutralize them. By integrating chitosan with the cerium oxide, we achieve a dual-action effect: the chitosan helps anchor and distribute the nanoparticles in a stable film on the surface (forming a strong, durable coating), and it provides an initial protective barrier against microbes even before the catalytic action kicks in.

In essence, chitosan makes Kismet Clean coatings especially versatile. The coating can be applied as a thin spray-on film or a more permanent paint-like layer, depending on the need. Once applied and dried, it forms a clear, invisible shield on the target surface. Because chitosan is biocompatible and cerium oxide is a mineral, the dried film is non-toxic and safe to touch. This was a crucial consideration in development – in communicating with food safety officers, we recognize the importance of any intervention to “do no harm” to employees, consumers, or equipment.

Kismet Clean’s technology is designed to complement, not replace, standard hygiene practices. By providing a continuously active surface, it provides protection between regular cleanings. Kismet Clean exemplifies the future of food safety technology: leveraging technology and material science to create environments inherently hostile to pathogens, thereby minimizing opportunities for cross-contamination.

Integrating Technology with Best Practices

While these technological advancements mark the next generation of cross-contamination prevention, they are most effective when integrated into a holistic food safety management plan. Food safety professionals recognize that a combination of innovative tools and rigorous best practices is the optimal path to preventing foodborne illness. Key strategies include:

  • Routine Environmental Monitoring: Regular testing of surfaces, equipment, and end products for microbial contamination is essential. Frequent swabbing and microbial assays (for example, testing for Listeria on floors or Salmonella on equipment) will identify hotspots and verify that interventions, like protective coatings, are working effectively. Data from monitoring can guide targeted sanitation efforts and trigger corrective actions before contaminants spread to food.
  • Enhanced Sanitation Protocols: Upgrading cleaning procedures by incorporating the latest microbial control solutions can dramatically improve outcomes. For example, using enzyme-based cleaners periodically to break down biofilms, followed by application of residual protective treatments, such as the Kismet Clean coating, can achieve a deeper clean than conventional detergents alone. Even simple tweaks – like extending contact time for cleaning agents or using higher water temperatures and steam in certain areas – can reduce microbial harborage. The goal is a multi-layered sanitation routine with minimal opportunity for pathogens to survive or transfer.
  • Employee Training and Hygiene: Human factors remain a leading cause of cross-contamination, so continuous emphasis on workforce training is critical. All staff should be educated on proper personal hygiene (hand washing, glove use, etc.), sanitation procedures, and the importance of separating raw and cooked product zones. Training programs with regular refreshers help employees understand how their actions can inadvertently spread bacteria and viruses. Cultivating a strong food safety culture where employees proactively prevent cross-contamination – by sanitizing tools, avoiding contact between raw and ready-to-eat foods, and strictly following protocols – is just as important as any high-tech intervention.
  • Hygienic Facility and Equipment Design: Considering cross-contamination prevention at the design stage can eliminate many problems before they start. This includes using equipment that is easy to disassemble and clean thoroughly and selecting smooth, non-porous, and corrosion-resistant materials to minimize microbial attachment. Ensuring proper facility zoning is also critical. Simple design considerations like sloped floors and effective drainage prevent water accumulation that could foster biofilms. Additionally, implementing one-way product flow and restricting personnel movement between high-risk and low-risk areas can greatly reduce opportunities for cross-contamination via traffic.

Conclusion: Toward a Safer Food Supply Through Innovation

Cross-contamination in food processing facilities will likely always pose some level of risk, but the landscape of food safety technology is rapidly evolving to meet this challenge. By combining data-driven insights, novel solutions for microbial control, and robust sanitation practices, the food industry is making significant strides in reducing contamination and preventing foodborne illnesses. The integration of innovations like enzymatic biofilm disruptors, UV-based sanitation systems, and real-time monitoring exemplifies a proactive approach – one that doesn’t wait for an outbreak to occur but rather builds prevention into the very fabric of the production process. Kismet Clean shows how leveraging cutting-edge science can yield practical tools that strengthen our defenses against invisible hazards.

Cross-contamination prevention is not solved by any single gadget or protocol; it requires an arsenal of strategies and an adaptive mindset as new threats emerge. Encouragingly, early adopters of advanced interventions are already reporting reductions in contamination rates and more robust control over persistent pathogens.

At Kismet Technologies, we provide solutions that enhance food safety. Kismet Clean offers continuous surface protection that complements existing sanitation protocols. If you are looking to enhance your facility’s hygiene practices and reduce contamination risks, our team is ready to help. Contact us today to learn more about how Kismet’s innovative technology can support your food safety initiatives.

References (APA style):

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2018). Estimates of foodborne illness in the United States. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). (2023). About Listeria infection. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/listeria/about/

Coughlan, L. M., Cotter, P. D., Hill, C., & Álvarez-Ordóñez, A. (2016). New weapons to fight old enemies: Novel strategies for the (bio)control of bacterial biofilms in the food industry. Frontiers in Microbiology, 7, 1641. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01641

Flick, G. J. (2007, July 1). Persistent biofilms problematic in aquaculture, food processing. Global Seafood Alliance: Responsible Seafood Advocate. Retrieved from https://www.globalseafood.org/advocate/persistent-biofilms-problematic-in-aquaculture-food-processing/

Holst, M. M., Wittry, B. C., Crisp, C., Torres, J., Irving, D. J., & Nicholas, D. (2025). Contributing factors of foodborne illness outbreaks — National Outbreak Reporting System, United States, 2014–2022. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 74(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7401a1

Kalosh, A. (2024, July 2). Kismet Clean cruise study shows “remarkable” microbial reduction, lasting protection.Seatrade Cruise News. Retrieved from https://www.seatrade-cruise.com/environmental-health/kismet-clean-cruise-study-shows-remarkable-microbial-reduction-lasting-protection

Kismet Technologies. (2024a). Poultry farm study – Field results [Internal report]. Orlando, FL.

Kismet Technologies. (2024b). Kismet Clean drain study report [Internal report]. Orlando, FL.

Pugazhendhi, A. S., Neal, C. J., Ta, K. M., Molinari, M., Singamaneni, S., Decho, A. W., … & Brisbois, E. J. (2024). A neoteric antibacterial ceria-silver nanozyme for abiotic surfaces. Biomaterials, 307, 122527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122527

Scallan, E., Hoekstra, R. M., Angulo, F. J., Tauxe, R. V., Widdowson, M. A., Roy, S. L., … & Griffin, P. M. (2011). Foodborne illness acquired in the United States—major pathogens. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1701.P11101

Zhang, N., Zhang, X., Yan, D., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Li, N., & Chen, Y. (2021). Antimicrobial properties of chitosan and chitosan derivatives in the treatment of enteric infections. Marine Drugs, 19(12), 693. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19120693

Ruiz-Llacsahuanga, B., Hamilton, A., Zaches, R., Hanrahan, I., & Critzer, F. (2021). Prevalence of Listeria species on food contact surfaces in Washington State apple packinghouses. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 87(9), e02932-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02932-20